Skip to content
Evidence Lab
English
Esc
navigateopen⌘Jpreview
On this page

Complete and review a deliverable in Work

You use ChatGPT Work to create a source-grounded file, follow the task while it runs, inspect the result, request a focused revision, and decide whether to accept it.

Result

You use ChatGPT Work to create a source-grounded file, follow the task while it runs, inspect the result, request a focused revision, and decide whether to accept it.

Selection guidance

Include when

Use this module when you can start Work but have not completed the full cycle from source material through file review and controlled revision.

Skip when

Skip it when you can independently produce a source-grounded file in Work, verify it against explicit criteria, and request a bounded revision.

Prerequisites

You have a focused practice project with two or three non-sensitive source files. You have prepared a Work task brief with an outcome, constraints, review criteria, and a stopping point.

Explanation

Work is complete when the deliverable passes its review criteria, not when the activity indicator stops or the file opens successfully. During the task, you can follow progress, answer questions, change direction, and approve or reject important actions. At the end, inspect both the content and the usable file.

The desktop app can preview generated documents, presentations, spreadsheets, PDFs, and supported web files. Where annotations are available, they let you point to a specific passage, table, chart, or slide and request a focused revision. A revision request should state what changes and what remains unchanged.

Actions

  1. Select ChatGPT, switch to Work, and open the prepared project.

  2. Choose local or cloud work according to the task brief and current availability.

  3. Attach or confirm the allowed source files and remove unrelated context.

  4. Submit this task or adapt it to your materials:

    Review the supplied sources and create a one-page decision brief for a research team. Include the decision, supported findings, risks, open questions, and a source note for every factual claim. Use only the supplied files. Return a draft for review and do not share or send it anywhere.

  5. Follow the progress display. Answer questions with information that stays inside the agreed scope. Review any approval request before continuing.

  6. When the draft is ready, open the generated file in the available preview or viewer.

  7. Check every required section, trace factual claims to the supplied files, and mark unsupported claims or omitted evidence.

  8. Select or name one specific passage and request a revision. State what must stay unchanged, for example: “Rewrite the recommendation to separate evidence from judgment. Keep the findings, risks, source notes, and file structure unchanged.”

  9. Open the revised file and repeat the checks. Record the file name, sources, changes requested, and final decision: accepted, needs another revision, or incomplete.

Practice

Repeat the workflow with another output type, such as a five-slide presentation or a comparison spreadsheet. Keep the same source set and quality criteria so you can compare how review differs by file type.

Deliverables

  • A source-grounded decision brief created in Work.
  • A completed review checklist.
  • A revised final file or an explicit incomplete result with unresolved gaps.

Check

  • The deliverable uses only the supplied sources or marks missing evidence explicitly.
  • You follow progress and handle questions or approvals without widening the task silently.
  • You inspect the generated file for content, structure, source use, and usability.
  • The focused revision changes the requested part without replacing correct material elsewhere.

If it fails

  • A source could not be opened. Ask Work to identify the inaccessible source and do not accept claims that depend on it.
  • The file preview opens but content is incomplete. Compare the draft with the task brief and request the missing section explicitly.
  • A revision rewrites too much. Name the exact passage, required change, and content that must remain unchanged.
  • The result is visually polished but weakly supported. Check every factual claim against the supplied sources before accepting the design.

Sources and verification

Sources: openai.chatgpt.work, openai.chatgpt.files, openai.chatgpt.projects, openai.chatgpt.use-chatgpt.

The Work progress, file creation, preview, annotation, and revision flow was checked against official OpenAI documentation on 8 September 2026. Preview and annotation support can vary by file type and surface. The exercise has not yet been field-validated with a learner.

Next: Understand Codex as an advanced working environment.